Which reason would NOT justify a PSO's authority to detain someone?

The justification for a Protective Security Officer's (PSO) authority to detain someone hinges on the need to maintain safety, order, and compliance with laws. The correct answer highlights that personal motivations do not provide a valid basis for detention. Detaining someone based on personal feelings or biases undermines the fundamental principles of justice and due process, which require objective reasoning and adherence to established laws.

In contrast, when a PSO is requested by federal law enforcement, they are acting under official authority, which supports the validity of the detention. Witnessing an ongoing crime provides direct evidence of wrongdoing, establishing a clear and immediate reason for intervention. Reasonable suspicion indicates that the PSO has a logical basis for believing that a crime may be occurring or has occurred, which justifies taking action.

Therefore, personal motivations lack the necessary legal and ethical grounding to warrant detention, emphasizing the importance of objective reasoning in law enforcement and security practices.